Who is hoaxing who with the "Making of Bigfoot"?
Written by Bill Miller
The Kal Korff Foreword
Earlier this year I had heard about a new book coming out that was supposed to answer many of the questions concerning the authenticity of the Roger Patterson/Bob Gimlin film taken in Bluff Creek, California in October of 1967. Having followed the subject of the Sasquatch for many years and having seen much of the evidence that had already been presented about the creature that Bob and Roger had allegedly encountered, I was expecting to see some real definitive evidence to the contrary coming from a book that was to be claiming the Patterson/Gimlin film was a hoax. As a Bigfoot enthusiast in my own right, I decided to look at this book through the eyes of a fellow investigator and not so much as a Bigfoot researcher. I think that some of the things that I observed during the reading of “The Making of Bigfoot” are worth pointing out and certainly calls into question just how definitive this book really is and more important, it calls into question the veracity of some of the people who took part in it. Many of you in the Bigfoot community have already heard from some the critics of this new book, but what I want to do is draw attention to a couple of things that the past critics did not address. The foreword of the book was written by Kal K. Korff. Why Greg Long, the books author, wanted to connect his book to Kal Korff is something that I am sure many Bigfoot researchers and/or people who have seen Korff’s other works have asked themselves and possibly by the time Long has read this article, I suspect that he too, will be one of them. The first time I heard of Kal Korff was when I saw a video he had done called “Final Verdict: JFK’s Murder Solved!” My having personally studied the JFK assassination for over a quarter of a century and having bought and read through a complete set of the 26 volumes of the Warren Commission and studied the findings of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, I wanted to know just how Kal Korff had managed to do what no one else had done, including two Government inquiries. Rather than to go into great depths of the fiasco pertaining to Korff’s video on the Kennedy case – I’ll just share a quick example of his inability or a lack of desire to learn the subject matter before making definitive claims about something. In the opening minutes of the ‘Final Verdict: JFK’s Murder Solved’ video … Korff mentions a little girl in “red pants” who is seen on the Zapruder film. Korff then gives her name as Linda Kay Willis and tells us what she said about the shooting. Linda Kay Willis had testified before the Warren Commission. I should tell everyone that the girl Kal Korff is talking about seeing on the Zapruder film was Rosemary Willis, not Linda Kay Willis. Rosemary is Linda Kay’s sister. Rosemary did not testify before the Commission, nor did either sister have on pants during the Kennedy assassination. Korff was in error because he did not know his subject matter well enough before trying to appear as an authority on it! While this may just be a case of self-aggrandizement, such behavior could also be a sign of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Psychiatrists at Morningside Recovery can help a patient's recovery with behavioral therapy but there is no known cure. Kal Korff wrongly identifies the little girl in the Zapruder Film and mistook her for wearing pants
